|
April 7, 2013
SEQRA Review Required of NY Water Withdrawal Permit Applications
Surprisingly, the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (the DEC),
the state agency charged with administering the State Environmental Quality Review
Act (SEQRA), did not conduct an environmental impact review pursuant to SEQRA of its
new water withdrawal permitting regulations, which became effective on April 1, 2013.
So the environmental impacts of the new program have not yet been assessed. (The new
water withdrawal regulations, amending 6 NYCRR Parts 601 and 621, are posted on
the DEC website here and here.)
But environmental impact assessments are required under SEQRA before the DEC processes
the individual permit applications it receives under the new program. Under the water
withdrawal regulations, applications for systems withdrawing 100 million gallons per
day (MGD) or more are due June 1, 2013. See 6 NYCRR 601.7(2).
Under the SEQRA regulations, 6 NYCRR 617.4(6)(ii), any project or action that
would use ground or surface water in excess of two MGD is a
Type I action, requiring an environmental impact review under SEQRA. A water withdrawal
application for 100 MGD or more is without a doubt a Type I action.
The names and locations of the water users subject to water permitting requirements
this year may be estimated from the list of large water users in the state I obtained
from the DEC pursuant to a Freedom of Information Law request several weeks ago. According
to this list, only 20 users in the state have a maximum daily usage of 100 MGD or more.
Eighteen of these users are power plants. Two are large municipal water systems—New
York City and Monroe County. A power plant is exempt from water withdrawal permitting
under Section Section 601.9 of the water regulations if it is a facility "operating under
a valid Federal Energy Regulating Commission license." I am currently
researching which, if any, of the power plants on the list below do not operate under
FERC licenses.
Residents and water users in the communities where non-exempt projects are located
should begin researching their options now and preparing to get involved in the SEQRA
reviews
of the water withdrawal permit applications by those projects.
Table 1. Water Users with Maximum Usage over 100 MGD
Facility Name |
Town/City |
County |
Average |
Units |
Max. |
Units |
St. Lawrence/ FDR Power Project |
Massena |
St.Lawrence |
79278.00 |
MGD |
108686.00 |
MGD |
Niagara Power Project |
Lewiston |
Niagara |
47463.00 |
MGD |
62164.00 |
MGD |
Indian Point 2&3 LLCs |
Cortlandt |
Westchester |
2024.00 |
MGD |
2489.00 |
MGD |
New York City DEP |
Neversink |
Sullivan |
1078.00 |
MGD |
1418.00 |
MGD |
James A. Fitzpatrick Nuclear Power Plant |
Scriba |
Oswego |
543.00 |
MGD |
596.00 |
MGD |
Ravenswood Generating Station |
Queens |
Queens |
512.90 |
MGD |
1390.00 |
MGD |
Arthur Kill Generating Station |
Richmond |
Richmond |
480.00 |
MGD |
712.80 |
MGD |
Astoria Generating Station |
Queens |
Queens |
455.60 |
MGD |
723.70 |
MGD |
RE Ginna Nuclear Power Plant |
Ontario |
Wayne |
427.00 |
MGD |
511.00 |
MGD |
Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station |
Scriba |
Oswego |
401.10 |
MGD |
457.10 |
MGD |
Roseton Generating Station |
Newburgh |
Orange |
340.54 |
MGD |
794.40 |
MGD |
Dunkirk Generating Station |
Dunkirk |
Chautauqua |
304.00 |
MGD |
|
|
Danskammer Generating |
Newburgh |
Orange |
278.80 |
MGD |
455.04 |
MGD |
East River Generating Station |
New York |
New York |
264.10 |
MGD |
371.80 |
MGD |
AES Somerset |
Somerset |
Niagara |
239.00 |
MGD |
274.00 |
MGD |
AES Cayuga |
Lansing |
Tompkins |
214.12 |
MGD |
243.36 |
MGD |
Huntley Generating Station |
Tonawanda |
Erie |
200.00 |
MGD |
406.00 |
MGD |
Oswego Harbor Power |
Oswego |
Oswego |
167.70 |
MGD |
364.21 |
MGD |
Genon Bowline |
Haverstraw |
Rockland |
74.94 |
MGD |
989.29 |
MGD |
Monroe County Water Authority-Shoremont |
Greece |
Monroe |
55.40 |
MGD |
109.00 |
MGD |
Source: Response to FOIL request to DEC, received March 27, 2013.
As noted in my overview of the new
water withdrawal permitting requirements, the implementation of the requirements
by DEC on a staggered schedule over a five-year period, with the largest users being
issued permits first is manifestly unfair to smaller users. While a review of the
water usage requirements of smaller users is not mandated under the water
regulations prior to the issuance of a permit to a larger water user, it is mandated
by the SEQRA regulations and needs to be addressed in the upcoming SEQRA reviews
of each water withdrawal permit application.
Table 2. Dates by which Application for Initial Permit Must Be Completed
June 1, 2013 |
Systems that withdraw or are designed to withdraw a volume of 100 million gallons
per day (mgd) or more |
Feb. 15, 2014 |
Systems that withdraw or are designed to withdraw a volume equal to or greater
than 10 mgd but less than 100 mgd |
Feb. 15, 2015 |
Systems that withdraw or are designed to withdraw a volume equal to or greater
than 2 mgd but less than 10 mgd |
Feb. 15, 2016 |
Systems that withdraw or are designed to withdraw a volume equal to or greater
than 0.5 mgd but less than 2 mgd |
Feb. 15, 2017 |
Systems that withdraw or are designed to withdraw a volume equal to or greater
than 0.1 but less than 0.5 mgd |
Source: 6 NYCRR 601.7(2) lists the dates by which a complete application for
an initial permit must be submitted.
|
|
|
About NY Water Law
New York Water
Law covers legal developments relating to water usage in New York
and elsewhere. The
author, Rachel Treichler, practices law in the Finger Lakes region. .
Search NY Water Law
Enter search terms:
Index of Posts
Index
of Posts by Month
Recommended Reading
|
|